Tim Amos KC

"He is a clear advocate, and judges sit up and listen to him because they know he knows exactly what he's talking about."

Chambers & Partners 2022

"Awesome ability to cut through detail."

"The patience of a saint."

"One of London’s go-to silks on jurisdiction and complex international issues."

"He is one of the sector’s biggest intellects and approaches each case from every angle with remarkable pace and agility."

Tim Amos KC

"He is a clear advocate, and judges sit up and listen to him because they know he knows exactly what he's talking about."

Chambers & Partners 2022

Call: 1987

Silk: 2008

Languages spoken: French and German

International Family Lawyer – equal emphasis on all three aspects and jurisdiction specialism. International linguist as well as lawyer, Tim’s “style of advocacy seems to clothe any client with respectability.” Thorpe LJ in Prest v Petrodel. ([2012] EWCA 1395 at [45]).

Overview

International Family Lawyer – equal emphasis on all three aspects and jurisdiction specialism. International linguist as well as lawyer, Tim’s “style of advocacy seems to clothe any client with respectability.” Thorpe LJ in Prest v Petrodel. ([2012] EWCA 1395 at [45]).

Overview

Tim is a barrister in international family law and formerly Head of Chambers at QEB (Queen Elizabeth Building): 2018-23. He has practised at QEB since 1988 and took silk in 2008 as QC (now KC). His practice spans all aspects of family law (including pre-nups and nuptial trusts) but he is predominantly known as an expert in “big money” family finance, married or unmarried, and alive or dead (including claims under the Inheritance Act).

Tim is ranked in Band One of The Legal 500 and of Chambers UK Bar Directory for Matrimonial Finance. The current Legal 500 praises Tim for his: “particular expertise and ‘encyclopedic knowledge’ of international family law.”  It also says: ‘Tim is the voice of sense and pragmatism, turning difficult cases into easy wins with his intelligent and meticulous approach.” The current Chambers Bar Directory says “Tim Amos KC is a highly experienced and respected money practitioner … and is noted for his skill in tackling complex jurisdiction issues … Tim Amos is very numerate and has expertise in international and EU conflicts. … He is a superb advocate and a barrister whose language skills often come into play – he speaks fluent German and French. … The absolute tops in terms of intellectual prowess when it comes to international family law; … a brilliant legal mind”

Previous directory entries (Chambers and Legal 500) have recorded that Tim is “one of the sector’s biggest intellects and approaches each case from every angle with remarkable pace and agility”, “absolutely outstanding”, “a beautiful advocate who has a superb manner with clients” and … “absolutely a go-to-person for complex work.” The dicrectories have also described Tim as … “a truly exceptional matrimonial barrister with a commercial head for business matters, who understands completely the mood and thinking of the family judges in the High Court”, as having “awesome ability to cut through detail”, and an “unshakeable grasp of a case” as well as “the patience of a saint”; and as being “fairly tough but very nice, you know that he is really going to take a case forward.” “Completely wonderful: he’s very wise, he’s always beautifully prepared and he has immense gravitas. He’s very strategic in his thinking. When you go to a conference with him, you know he will be ready to advise and he will have thought about it in the round.”

Expertise

Tim’s litigation reports of interest include: Prest v Petrodel [2012] EWCA Civ 1395 and [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] 2FLR 576 + 732, the watershed case on company assets and piercing the corporate veil in family proceedings, in which Tim represented the companies in the Court of Appeal and the UK Supreme Court; T v T (Brussels II Revised: Art.15) [2013] 2FLR 1326, on transferring proceedings within Europe; Mittal [2014] 1FLR 1514, CA, which re-established the possibility of staying English divorce proceedings in non-European cases even while the UK remained within the EU; S v S (Brussels II Revised: Articles 19 (1) and (3): reference to the CJEU) [2014] EWHC 3613 (Fam) and the resultant 2015 CJEU decision of A v B (C-489/14 [2016] 1FLR 31) about priority of EU matrimonial proceedings. Tim also appeared in the Privy Council case of Bromfield [2015] UKPC 19 in relation to maintenance obligations (on appeal from Jamaica); in the English Court of Appeal decision of Magiera [2016] Civ 1292 concerning exclusive jurisdiction under Brussels I Art.22 in TLATA land proceedings; and in MA v SK; S Investments v MA (Financial Relief after Saudi Divorce) [2016] 1FLR 310 (Part III and “needs-light”). In the context of domestic English matrimonial finance, Tim appeared in Goddard-Watts [2017] 2FLR 114 (in relation to the Court’s approach on re-hearings after non-disclosure); in ND v SD [2017] EWHC 1507 (sham trusts and beneficial ownership); and in NN v AS [2018] EWHC 2973 (Part III/ TLATA, trusts, forgery and the extended family).  Tim also appeared in the multi-jurisdictional Schedule 1 case of Re C (a child) [2021] EWFC 32 (Sir James Munby – EU ‘reflexive effect’ in relation to non-EU jurisdictions); in the Court of Appeal international jurisdiction case of Manetta v de Filippo [2022] EWCA Civ 409; and, most recently back again in the Supreme Court, successfully resisting the leap-frog SC appeal in Unger (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) + Al Shaiba [2023 UKSC 22] – Part III, abatement and whether financial claims survive death: the livestream of Tim’s submissions is available as a standalone immediate link on the UKSC website for 20/10/22, afternoon session.

Germanophone cases, Francophone cases and expert witness evidence

Tim is fluent in German (including legal German) and has work experience in German courts and German law firms. This led to his involvement in an increasing number of cases with an Anglo-Germanophone element and/or German-speaking clients or witnesses, and those with disclosure issues relating to assets in German-speaking jurisdictions, including Austria, Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

In terms of Tim’s work as an expert witness, his contribution has been singled out for praise by the Austrian Supreme Court as “clear and comprehensive” (Case 30b45/18s, judgment 14.8.18, para 4.4). In this context, see also the webstream of Tim’s expert evidence (in English) to the EU Parliament Juri Committee on Legal Affairs in March 2019 in relation to the effect of Brexit on families and children from the perspective of International Family Law: link here; and also his skype interview for the Resolution national annual conference in Manchester in April 2019, on the implications of no-deal Brexit for International Family Law : link here

Tim also speaks professional French and has experience of French family courts (both first instance JAFs and Cour d’Appel). He lectures in German and French as well as English (see English video-clip here , from an update on CJEU family law given in Trier in September 2017), most recently delivering French workshops at the Belgian Family Law Convention and the annual French equivalent Etats Generaux Droit de la Famille.

For an example of Tim’s foreign language work see this PDF from the Göttingen University Law School Family Law Workshop on European Maintenance Law with Professor Dr. Coester-Waltjen and Judge Dose of the German Federal Appeal Court. Tim’s publications in German include “Unterhalt … nach dem englischen Rechtssystem FamRZ 7/2012 500 and “Verstärkte Zusammenarbeit auch mal in England FamFR 13/2013 291; and (with Professor Anatol Dutta) “Europäische Zuständigkeit in Ehesachen bei drittstaatlicher Rechtshängigkeit” FamRZ 6/2014 444; and in French “L’entente cordiale franco-anglaise: une approche bilingue [2015] RJ1 Personnes et Famille 7 (with Isabelle Rein-Lescastereyres of the Paris Bar and Nicholas Bennett then of Farrer & Co. solicitors), published also in German in NZFam 19/2015 898 and in English at [2015] IFLR 23: “Interpreting the Application of English Matrimonial Finance Law to the French Law of Matrimonial Property Regime; and why English family lawyers need to understand the concept of Matrimonial Property Regime, even if they don’t like it”.

Tim has also put together and chaired legal conferences such as the 3-day Education Programme for the IAML/IAFL in Salzburg, Austria in 2013 and in Lisbon, Portugal in 2017, including multi-jurisdiction discussion-panel sessions: see the Jordans webinar excerpt here.

Dispute Resolution beyond court

Tim is committed to dispute resolution in all its forms, by litigation and otherwise. He is a Resolution-trained Mediator (and mediating experience in both English and German) and a qualified Collaborative Lawyer. Tim was the first Collaborative Family Law KC at the English Bar: see his explanatory interview of the Collaborative Barrister’s role here . He also sits in a judicial capacity part-time as a specialist Family Recorder and conducts private FDRs on request.

Prior to taking Silk, Tim was for seven years Standing Counsel to the Queen’s Proctor, a government appointment to advise the Treasury Solicitor on all matters of family law with a public interest element, including the validity of foreign marriages and divorces, and, for example, transgender marriage (before the Gender Recognition Act 2004): see Bellinger [2001] EWCA Civ 1140.

Tim also appeared in the multi-jurisdictional Schedule 1 case of Re C (a child) [2021] EWFC 32 (Sir James Munby – EU ‘reflexive effect’ in relation to non-EU jurisdictions); in the Court of Appeal international jurisdiction case of Manetta v de Filippo [2022] EWCA Civ 409; and, most recently back again in the Supreme Court, successfully resisting the leap-frog SC appeal in Unger (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) + Al Shaiba [2023] UKSC 22 – Part III, abatement and whether financial claims survive death: the livestream of Tim’s submissions is available as a standalone immediate link on the UKSC website for 20/10/22, afternoon session.  The Unger case was subsequently voted “Family Law Case of the Year” by Family Law.

 

“Tim is phenomenally good at getting his head around complex facts and details, and has a mastery of case law and legislation that you would only otherwise find in a textbook. He is particularly good where there are academic questions of law, jurisdictional challenges, or mind-boggling amounts of information to assimilate, and he does it all with elegance. He is a clear advocate, and judges sit up and listen to him because they know he knows exactly what he's talking about”
Chambers & Partners 2022
“A renowned international family law barrister who handles very substantial divorce proceedings, particularly those involving jurisdictional disputes …” “Rated extremely highly by the market for his abilities in international family law and international family finance ”
“Rated extremely highly by the market for his abilities in international family law and international family finance”
“One of London’s ‘go-to' silks on jurisdiction and complex international issues”
Unger (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) + Al Shaiba [2023 UKSC 22] – Part III, abatement and whether financial claims survive death Manetta v de Filippo [2022] EWCA Civ 409 Re C (a child) [2021] EWFC 32 (Sir James Munby – EU ‘reflexive effect’ in relation to non-EU jurisdictions NN v AS [2018] EWHC 2973 – Part III/ TLATA, trusts, forgery and the extended family Goddard-Watts [2017] 2FLR 114 – Court’s approach on re-hearings after non-disclosure ND v SD [2017] EWHC 1507 – sham trusts and beneficial ownership Magiera [2016] Civ 1292 – Brussels 1 exclusive TLATA jurisdiction A v B [2016] 1FLR 31 – C-489 / 14: Art.19, BIIR MA v SK; S Investments v MA (Financial Relief after Saudi Divorce) [2015] EWHC 887 – “needs-light” in Part III Applicant G v G Respondent Bromfield [2015] UKPC 19 – Jamaican maintenance S v S (Brussels II Revised: Articles 19 (1) and (3): reference to the CJEU [2014] EWHC 3613 Re G (Jurisdiction: Articles 19 BIIR) [2014] Fam Law 1111, CA Mittal [2013] EWCA Civ 1255 [2014] 1FLR 1514, CA – stays in non-European divorce cases T v T (Brussels II Revised: Art.15) [2013] 2FLR 1326 – transferring cases within Europe Prest v Petrodel Resources Limited [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] 4 All ER 673, [2013] 3 WLR 1, [2013] 3 Prest v. Petrodel Resources Limited [2013] UKSC 34 (Supreme Court) W v H [2012] EWHC 1103 (Fam), aka KIM v Morris [2013] 2FLR 1197 – reconciliation Prest v Petrodel [2012] EWCA Civ 1395, [2013] 2 FLR 576, CA – first appeal Schofield v Schofield [2011] 1 FLR 2129, CA – Part III applied to English pensions Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171, [2011] Fam Law 34 + 163 – inherited wealth TL v ML and others [2006] 36 Fam Law 183 – third party extended ownership / support Wermuth No.1 [2003] 1FLR 1022 – seizin and Article 11(4) under Brussels II Islam [2003] 2FLR 1208 – fraudulent divorce petition Wermuth No. 2 [2003] 1 FLR 1029 (Court of Appeal) – protective/provisional measures under Brussels II Bellinger [2002] Fam 150 [2001] 2FLR 1048 (CA) – transsexual capacity to marry
  • Oriel College, Oxford (MA in Ancient and Modern History)
  • University of Westminster (Diploma in Law)
  • Fellow and Governor of the International Academy of Family Lawyers (IAFL, previously IAML)
  • Family Law Bar Association
  • British German Jurists Association
  • Franco-British Lawyers Society
  • Resolution affiliate member

Born 1964. Married and lives in London. Enjoys music and wine (separately and together).

Tim Amos KC is regulated by the Bar Standards Board. To view our complaints policy please click here.

See Privacy Notice.

Get in touch with Tim or request a call back

Call 020 7797 7837 or complete the form to contact Tim or request a call back. (*Indicates a mandatory field)

    By submitting this form, you consent to your data being collected and stored, and consent to us contacting you by email or telephone with regards to your enquiry.

    logo logo logo